ditavonbre:

socialismartnature:

Yesterday, Sen. Vitter of Louisiana offered up an amendment to permanently drop anyone ever convicted of a violent crime from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). According to Robert Greenstein, president of the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, Democrats in the Senate obliged him. The amendment is for a farm bill, which is currently being debated in the Senate.

Says Greenstein:

The amendment would bar from SNAP (food stamps), for life, anyone who was ever convicted of one of a specified list of violent crimes at any time — even if they committed the crime decades ago in their youth and have served their sentence, paid their debt to society, and been a good citizen ever since. In addition, the amendment would mean lower SNAP benefits for their children and other family members.

So, a young man who was convicted of a single crime at age 19 who then reforms and is now elderly, poor, and raising grandchildren would be thrown off SNAP, and his grandchildren’s benefits would be cut. … Democrats accepted it without trying to modify it to address its most ill-considered aspects.

Two-thirds of SNAP recipients are children, elderly or the disabled, and two-fifths of SNAP households live below half the poverty line.

What does this solve? Because I committed a crime I should not be allowed to eat? The way our current prison system is set up these individuals struggle to find meaningful work. Cutting off of their benefits causes much more harm than good. Also, not only would SNAP benefits to children and family members be reduced but in most situations eliminated completely. Children should not have to grow up with the burden of hunger and having to provide for themselves. If anything this may push them towards a life of crime trying to put food on the tables for their families! Absolutely deplorable.